wpd0dd4f5e_0f.jpg
wp4360f6d0.png
wp4360f6d0.png
wp4360f6d0.png
wpb1363e83.png
wp128f3b5a.png
wp4360f6d0.png
wp003ea692.png
wp49540146.png
wp6d66be63.png
wp89a6b940.png
wp9773a521.png
wp4360f6d0.png
Schematic of a waste rock dump profile
sources of non-uniform infiltration
wp39d225ae.png
wp570e2436.png
wp1320595d.png
wpb766856f.png
Sources of non-uniform infiltration in waste rock dumps with berms
as the cause of  instability with multi-functional cover,
see also M. Lersow [13,15,16]
wp9dac345a.png
basal recharge
upslope leading
Schematic and development of a landslide
wpa8f66d36.png
wpc95b5748.png
Wismut-Remediation-Project,
waste rock dump No. 366 at the motorway feeder A72, Schlema/Alberoda,
photos by M. Lersow
wp028b9448_0f.jpg
Surface of rupture
Sliding of cover
wp4e7d056c.png
wpf0cfe49c.png
wpb63e8a84.png
Part of the water-gathering system
Berm
wp5d036e4d_0f.jpg
wp48612a83.png
Proof of stability for waste rock dumps
Especially for mighty multi-functional dump slope-systems of mining residue dumps must be subjected the rehabilitation technology to extensive stability proofs, before it is brought to application. This is on the one hand because of the substantial costs, which develop during the final closure of waste rock  dump, necessary, which with failure of the dump slopes still multiply (this occurs however with delay, after completion of closure works), on the other hand the necessity is defined by the task. Due to the non-homogeneous and the anisotropic behaviour of  waste rock dump-bodies the necessary material-parameters for the calculation-model with stochastic methods must be determined. Safety conditions, which in such a way are determined, reflect the behavior of the waste rock  dump body with high probability correctly.  Thus the insight became generally accepted, that the safety proofs determined on the basis of deterministic methods are connect with substantial uncertainties. It should be supplemented by stochastic views, if so determined safety factors are not to cause a wrong safety feeling. This becomes the more necessary, if the realization comes, that the safety proof to a large extent from the view time depends. It is generally used practice to differentiate between an initial-stability proof and a longterm-stability proof. On multi-functional dump slope-systems (increase of stability, protection against infiltration, radiation protection, emission protection, vegetation layer etc.) the cover is laid in parallel layers (layer-wise cover construction) and mostly is provided with functional elements. That include the danger of a precipitous change of the permeability and/or the stiffness between the individual layers of the cover and/or individual areas. The emergence of sources of non-uniform infiltration have the consequence of the increase of the danger of a landslide. This generally strengthened by the consolidation process and by the natural erosion (aging) of the cover-material. An indicator for it is the pore water pressure in the cover and in the waste dump body and its behavior over the time. If into the dump-slope-systems a quality assurance system (e.g. pore water pressure transmitters) is integrated, one can determine easily the shear-strengths and thus on this basis local-faithful and time-faithful stability proofs could be carried out, which then should be component of the monitoring software. Loadable international experiences exist both in equipment and in pertinent software. In order to seek  out anomalies, geophysical field-tests should go into the Standard-monitoring progam.
Cone pressure-mountains (pc) of a disposal site- body,
dependent from the time t and the depth h
Graph of a combination-cone penetration test of a waste rock  dump-body,
CCPT, CPT with radiometric probe and pore- pressure transmitter
Cover-systems for waste rock  dumps of Wismut-site Schlema/Alberoda
with function-determined parameters for installation and longterm-condition,
according to Dipl.-Berging. Reinhold Marski, Hamburger Bodenkundliche Arbeiten, Band 56, 2005
Safety definition for circular-cylindrical sliding surfaces
wp4d32f392_0f.jpg
wp557243a3_0f.jpg
Method of slices by Bishop, see also German-standard DIN 1054, new 2005
wp0a8a24af_0f.jpg
wp7067734c_0f.jpg
wp1a2d0f2c_0f.jpg
wpdfe02dae_0f.jpg
wp3c782d9b.png
wpfbae116e.png
wpd0dddcdc.png
wp96db0af8.png
wp03d7e26d.png
Sliding surface
wp0b03e12f.png
Blade i
r
wpe7b081b6.png
wp0d267cb6.png
wp1f7e07d0.png
wp9eb3b32e.png
Berm 2
Berm 3
wpf4d2a9a5.png
wp538a02a1.png
wp839416ba.png
wpcbb7b251.png
wp64df908a.png
wpaef33f6f.png
Sliding volume
wpdf53d7a1.png
wp0c8fdd04.png
wpb56b90a9.png
wp43a16f3b.png
wp3d5247f2.png
With these parameters determined safety, according to Bishop,
in time of beginning of the sliding in this area:
wp1848cbfc.png
Only with the nearly total loss of the shear strength in the sliding surface and/or substantial outside moments, related to the midpoint of the sliding circle, the failure of the stability in parts of this multi-functional cover can be explained. Outside moments can however hardly occur with this example, so that with high probability the volume on the dump water in the sliding surface into a stable condition "swum" downward.
wp4b42abef.png
wp89f2a64b.png
Start of page
wp1b18be35.png
wp34821008_0f.jpg